A Better Kind of Backup

We'll start by exploring how version control can be used to keep track of what one person did and when.

Setting Up

The first time we use Git on a new machine, we need to configure a few things. Here's how Dracula sets up his new laptop:

$ git config --global user.name "Vlad Dracula"
$ git config --global user.email "vlad@tran.sylvan.ia"
$ git config --global color.ui "auto"
$ git config --global core.editor "nano"

(Please use your own name and email address instead of Dracula's, and please make sure you choose an editor that's actually on your system, such as nano, vi or emacs).

Git commands are written git verb, where verb is what we actually want it to do. In this case, we're telling Git:

• our name and email address,
• to colorize output,
• what our favorite text editor is, and
• that we want to use these settings globally (i.e., for every project),

The four commands above only need to be run once: the flag --global tells Git to use the settings for every project on this machine.

Creating a Repository

Once Git is configured, we can start using it. Let's create a directory for our work:

$ mkdir planets
$ cd planets

and tell Git to make it a repository—a place where Git can store old versions of our files:

$ git init

If we use ls to show the directory's contents, it appears that nothing has changed:

$ ls

But if we add the -a flag to show everything, we can see that Git has created a hidden directory called .git:

$ ls -a

.	..	.git

Git stores information about the project in this special sub-directory. If we ever delete it, we will lose the project's history.

We can check that everything is set up correctly by asking Git to tell us the status of our project:

$ git status

# On branch master
#
# Initial commit
#
nothing to commit (create/copy files and use "git add" to track)

Challenge: Places to Create Git Repositories

Dracula starts a new project, moons, related to his planets project. Despite Wolfman's concerns, he enters the following sequence of commands to create one Git repository inside another:

 cd             # return to home directory
 mkdir planets  # make a new directory planets
 cd planets     # go into planets
 git init       # make the planets directory a Git repository
 mkdir moons    # make a sub-directory planets/moons
 cd moons       # go into planets/moons
 git init       # make the moons sub-directory a Git repository

Why is it a bad idea to do this? How can Dracula "undo" his last git init?

Tracking Changes to Files

Let's create a file called mars.txt that contains some notes about the Red Planet's suitability as a base. (We'll use nano to edit the file; you can use whatever editor you like. In particular, this does not have to be the core.editor you set globally earlier.)

$ nano mars.txt

Type the text below into the mars.txt file:

Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color

mars.txt now contains a single line:

$ ls

mars.txt

$ cat mars.txt

Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color

If we check the status of our project again, Git tells us that it's noticed the new file:

$ git status

# On branch master
#
# Initial commit
#
# Untracked files:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#	mars.txt
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

The "untracked files" message means that there's a file in the directory that Git isn't keeping track of. We can tell Git that it should do so using git add:

$ git add mars.txt

and then check that the right thing happened:

$ git status

# On branch master
#
# Initial commit
#
# Changes to be committed:
#   (use "git rm --cached <file>..." to unstage)
#
#	new file:   mars.txt
#

Git now knows that it's supposed to keep track of mars.txt, but it hasn't yet recorded any changes for posterity as a commit. To get it to do that, we need to run one more command:

$ git commit -m "Starting to think about Mars"

[master (root-commit) f22b25e] Starting to think about Mars
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 mars.txt

When we run git commit, Git takes everything we have told it to save by using git add and stores a copy permanently inside the special .git directory. This permanent copy is called a revision and its short identifier is f22b25e. (Your revision may have another identifier.)

We use the -m flag (for "message") to record a comment that will help us remember later on what we did and why. If we just run git commit without the -m option, Git will launch nano (or whatever other editor we configured at the start) so that we can write a longer message.

If we run git status now:

$ git status

# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean

it tells us everything is up to date. If we want to know what we've done recently, we can ask Git to show us the project's history using git log:

$ git log

commit f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date:   Thu Aug 22 09:51:46 2013 -0400

    Starting to think about Mars

git log lists all revisions made to a repository in reverse chronological order. The listing for each revision includes the revision's full identifier (which starts with the same characters as the short identifier printed by the git commit command earlier), the revision's author, when it was created, and the log message Git was given when the revision was created.

Where Are My Changes?

If we run ls at this point, we will still see just one file called mars.txt. That's because Git saves information about files' history in the special .git directory mentioned earlier so that our filesystem doesn't become cluttered (and so that we can't accidentally edit or delete an old version).

Challenge: Committing Changes to Git

Which command(s) below would save the changes of myfile.txt to my local Git repository?

1.

$ git commit -m "my recent changes"

2.

$ git init myfile.txt
$ git commit -m "my recent changes"

3.

$ git add myfile.txt
$ git commit -m "my recent changes"

4.

$ git commit -m myfile.txt "my recent changes"

Changing a File

Now suppose Dracula adds more information to the file. (Again, we'll edit with nano and then cat the file to show its contents; you may use a different editor, and don't need to cat.)

$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt

Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman

When we run git status now, it tells us that a file it already knows about has been modified:

$ git status

# On branch master
# Changes not staged for commit:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
#   modified:   mars.txt
#
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

The last line is the key phrase: "no changes added to commit". We have changed this file, but we haven't told Git we will want to save those changes (which we do with git add) much less actually saved them. Let's double-check our work using git diff, which shows us the differences between the current state of the file and the most recently saved version:

$ git diff

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..315bf3a 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman

The output is cryptic because it is actually a series of commands for tools like editors and patch telling them how to reconstruct one file given the other. If we can break it down into pieces:

1. The first line tells us that Git is using the Unix diff command to compare the old and new versions of the file.
2. The second line tells exactly which revisions of the file Git is comparing; df0654a and 315bf3a are unique computer-generated labels for those revisions.
3. The remaining lines show us the actual differences and the lines on which they occur. In particular, the + markers in the first column show where we are adding lines.

Let's commit our change:

$ git commit -m "Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend"

# On branch master
# Changes not staged for commit:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
#	modified:   mars.txt
#
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

Whoops: Git won't commit because we didn't use git add first. Let's fix that:

$ git add mars.txt
$ git commit -m "Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend"

[master 34961b1] Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Git insists that we add files to the set we want to commit before actually committing anything because we may not want to commit everything at once. For example, suppose we're adding a few citations to our supervisor's work to our thesis. We might want to commit those additions, and the corresponding addition to the bibliography, but not commit the work we're doing on the conclusion (which we haven't finished yet).

To allow for this, Git has a special staging area where it keeps track of things that have been added to the current change set but not yet committed. git add puts things in this area, and git commit then copies them to long-term storage (as a commit):

Let's watch as our changes to a file move from our editor to the staging area and into long-term storage. First, we'll add another line to the file:

$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt

Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

$ git diff

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index 315bf3a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
 The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

So far, so good: we've added one line to the end of the file (shown with a + in the first column). Now let's put that change in the staging area and see what git diff reports:

$ git add mars.txt
$ git diff

There is no output: as far as Git can tell, there's no difference between what it's been asked to save permanently and what's currently in the directory. However, if we do this:

$ git diff --staged

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index 315bf3a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
 The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

it shows us the difference between the last committed change and what's in the staging area. Let's save our changes:

$ git commit -m "Thoughts about the climate"

[master 005937f] Thoughts about the climate
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

check our status:

$ git status

# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean

and look at the history of what we've done so far:

$ git log

commit 005937fbe2a98fb83f0ade869025dc2636b4dad5
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date:   Thu Aug 22 10:14:07 2013 -0400

    Thoughts about the climate

commit 34961b159c27df3b475cfe4415d94a6d1fcd064d
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date:   Thu Aug 22 10:07:21 2013 -0400

    Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend

commit f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date:   Thu Aug 22 09:51:46 2013 -0400

    Starting to think about Mars

To recap, when we want to add changes to our repository, we first need to add the changed files to the staging area (git add) and then commit the staged changes to the repository (git commit):

Challenge: Managing bio Repository

Create a new Git repository on your computer called bio. Write a three-line biography for yourself in a file called me.txt, commit your changes, then modify one line and add a fourth and display the differences between its updated state and its original state.

Exploring History

If we want to see what we changed when, we use git diff again, but refer to old versions using the notation HEAD~1, HEAD~2, and so on:

$ git diff HEAD~1 mars.txt

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index 315bf3a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
 The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

$ git diff HEAD~2 mars.txt

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

In this way, we build up a chain of revisions. The most recent end of the chain is referred to as HEAD; we can refer to previous revisions using the ~ notation, so HEAD~1 (pronounced "head minus one") means "the previous revision", while HEAD~123 goes back 123 revisions from where we are now.

We can also refer to revisions using those long strings of digits and letters that git log displays. These are unique IDs for the changes, and "unique" really does mean unique: every change to any set of files on any machine has a unique 40-character identifier. Our first commit was given the ID f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b, so let's try this:

$ git diff f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b mars.txt

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

That's the right answer, but typing random 40-character strings is annoying, so Git lets us use just the first few:

$ git diff f22b25e mars.txt

diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

Recovering Old Versions

All right: we can save changes to files and see what we've changed—how can we restore older versions of things? Let's suppose we accidentally overwrite our file:

$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt

We will need to manufacture our own oxygen

git status now tells us that the file has been changed, but those changes haven't been staged:

$ git status

# On branch master
# Changes not staged for commit:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
#	modified:   mars.txt
#
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

We can put things back the way they were by using git checkout:

$ git checkout HEAD mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt

Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity

As you might guess from its name, git checkout checks out (i.e., restores) an old version of a file. In this case, we're telling Git that we want to recover the version of the file recorded in HEAD, which is the last saved revision. If we want to go back even further, we can use a revision identifier instead:

$ git checkout f22b25e mars.txt

It's important to remember that we must use the revision number that identifies the state of the repository before the change we're trying to undo. A common mistake is to use the revision number of the commit in which we made the change we're trying to get rid of:

Simplifying the Common Case

If you read the output of git status carefully, you'll see that it includes this hint:

(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)

As it says, git checkout without a version identifier restores files to the state saved in HEAD. The double dash -- is needed to separate the names of the files being recovered from the command itself: without it, Git would try to use the name of the file as the revision identifier.

The fact that files can be reverted one by one tends to change the way people organize their work. If everything is in one large document, it's hard (but not impossible) to undo changes to the introduction without also undoing changes made later to the conclusion. If the introduction and conclusion are stored in separate files, on the other hand, moving backward and forward in time becomes much easier.

Challenge: Recovering Older Versions of a File

Jennifer has made changes to the Python script that she has been working on for weeks, and the modifications she made this morning "broke" the script and it no longer runs. She has spent ~ 1hr trying to fix it, with no luck…

Luckily, she has been keeping track of her project's versions using Git! Which commands below will let her recover the last committed version of her Python script called data_cruncher.py?

1.

~~~
$ git checkout HEAD
~~~

2.

~~~
$ git checkout HEAD data_cruncher.py
~~~

3.

~~~
$ git checkout HEAD~1 data_cruncher.py
~~~

4.

~~~
$ git checkout <unique ID of last commit> data_cruncher.py
~~~

5.

Both 2 and 4

Ignoring Things

What if we have files that we do not want Git to track for us, like backup files created by our editor or intermediate files created during data analysis. Let's create a few dummy files:

$ mkdir results
$ touch a.dat b.dat c.dat results/a.out results/b.out

and see what Git says:

$ git status

# On branch master
# Untracked files:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#	a.dat
#	b.dat
#	c.dat
#	results/
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

Putting these files under version control would be a waste of disk space. What's worse, having them all listed could distract us from changes that actually matter, so let's tell Git to ignore them.

We do this by creating a file in the root directory of our project called .gitignore.

$ nano .gitignore
$ cat .gitignore

*.dat
results/

These patterns tell Git to ignore any file whose name ends in .dat and everything in the results directory. (If any of these files were already being tracked, Git would continue to track them.)

Once we have created this file, the output of git status is much cleaner:

$ git status

# On branch master
# Untracked files:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#	.gitignore
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

The only thing Git notices now is the newly-created .gitignore file. You might think we wouldn't want to track it, but everyone we're sharing our repository with will probably want to ignore the same things that we're ignoring. Let's add and commit .gitignore:

$ git add .gitignore
$ git commit -m "Add the ignore file"
$ git status

# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean

As a bonus, using .gitignore helps us avoid accidentally adding files to the repository that we don't want.

$ git add a.dat

The following paths are ignored by one of your .gitignore files:
a.dat
Use -f if you really want to add them.
fatal: no files added

If we really want to override our ignore settings, we can use git add -f to force Git to add something. We can also always see the status of ignored files if we want:

$ git status --ignored

# On branch master
# Ignored files:
#  (use "git add -f <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#        a.dat
#        b.dat
#        c.dat
#        results/

nothing to commit, working directory clean